Today I will tell you about a very interesting device. It is interesting because it can withstand unrealistically high wattages with its compactness. But it will not be without competitors, the main competitors of this tank will be Moonshot and Tornado nano. The trend of reducing the size while maintaining performance is gaining momentum and some people are even happy with it. The only downside to this concept is the small autonomy of the tanks. In my opinion you are either using a standalone tank or piling from a non-standalone drip, so I don’t stick to this concept, but, to each his own.” So, today we are going to talk about the Coil Art Mage RDTA.
The external tank reminds me a lot of Moonshot, I would even say they are like 2 drops of water similar, but the differences are still present. online vaping shop in australia For example, the diameter is 22mm at Moonshot vs 24mm at Coil Art Mage, hence the base at Coil Art Mage will be bigger. But let’s not go into details, let’s discuss the specifications of Coil Art Mage.
The base is a velocity stand with 2 mm diameter holes, the diameter of the base itself is 15,2 mm, so you can install very fat windings. The diameter of the blow holes under the spirals is 4 mm, the diameter of the liquid supply holes is 2.5 mm, and there are 4 of them in total. There will be no problems with liquid supply and blowing.
The tank volume is only 3.5 mm, but it is still 2 times bigger than the Moonshot, it is affected by the diameter of 24 mm. Top filling. Under the lid of the tank there are two large holes, it is not difficult to fill the tank through them, in general you can even try it from a bucket.
Blowing is an important part of the tank, which is designed to pile up. And that’s where it went wrong. The blower is two 9x1mm holes, which is enough for a maximum of 100 watts of power, and that’s not what I would have liked to see. I hope there will be a next version of the tank with a more powerful airflow, the flavor profile of this tank is so bad, why didn’t they make the airflow more powerful?
It’s time to summarize the results. Everything about this tank was good, even great, until I got to the blower. It spoiled the picture a lot, because I made it a competitor to tanks that can handle 150-200 watts of power. Its bar stopped at 100-120 watts, and this is taking into account that the size of the base is larger than that of the same Munshot. But still against the background of competitors it looks decent, although it has not yet reached such heights, but it can be easily corrected by increasing the airflow. But on the other hand, the manufacturer did not set the bar at 200 watts, so the tank perfectly copes with those tasks that the manufacturer counted on. But it would be possible to make it at least tastier, the same griffin is designed for tasty vapor, and here neither here nor there.
